Thursday, November 22, 2012
found family
my friend mikiel and i sometimes talk about the importance of what he has called "found family," those people who become your family in whatever place you live, no matter how close you are to your biological family. i’m talking about the people you choose to surround yourself with. john, mikiel, and zebra constitute my drinking family: our home is any bar.
from what i understand, mikiel finds himself still close to his biological family, though like him, his siblings have flung themselves outward from their parents’ indiana home. my family still lives back in the south, in alabama and georgia, but i try to keep up. i call them frequently. i visit them whenever possible. i miss them. but i think the propensity mikiel and i share to integrate others into our familial fabric stems directly from our parents, from the way our families functioned growing up.
mikiel has shared with me stories about his parents’ sociability: a backyard garden his house shared with his neighbors, other families that created a larger tribe, the dinners that his parents regularly prepared and shared with others, the traditions they built with other families. mikiel in portland has stitched together a wider net just as his parents did.
growing up my relations existed beyond blood. uncle dave (or super dave my sister and i called him in reference to his compulsion to speed) had befriended my father in years before in birmingham while my father had been in college. dave still lived a debaucherous life i’m sure; he and my parents young. as a child, we understood him to be a part of our family. he eventually came into trouble though. i found himself strangely reminded of him this past weekend when i received several phone calls from an unidentified number: “this is a collect call from ‘the tallapoosa county jail.’” dave eventually found himself estranged from our family as his own life fell apart.
i haven’t seen one of my other “uncles” in years either. my sister and i loved our uncle robert, probably because if dave was a friend of my father’s, our uncle robert actually loved us. as children he didn’t just dismiss us as children. he liked seeing us and playing with us and talking to us. he probably wanted children of his own. robert always gave us the best christmas gifts: large leather-bound national geographic special editions. books he thought we should read. books that made us feel mature and smart. books that were beautiful. one year he gave me a political biography of abraham lincoln, a little difficult for a nine or ten year old but a subject matter i found interesting when i finally read the book later in college. and one year he gave me a copy of look homeward, angel by thomas wolfe for my birthday with a note telling me he thought this should be my coming of age novel. three generations of steam of consciousness later and a decade of my life, i finally made it through look homeward, angel and it has become one of my favorite novels, something i definitely need to re-read.
eight years ago, i did not share any love for a particular novel with my friend jordan, but i did share art history with her. as art history majors in a tiny department, we attended almost every art history class in college together, sitting next to each other right by our professor dr. spies with whom we were in love. we held hands during the lecture and cooed over the smooth beautiful of a caravaggio or ingres, delighted in the painterly texture of john singer sargent or the talent of thomas eakins, laughed at the antics of marcel duchamp or yves klein.
eight years ago i lived in my first apartment, on a hill on sixteenth avenue south in birmingham. the dorms were closing for the thanksgiving holiday but jordan did not want to go home. so i suggested she stay with me for the holiday, come with me to my family’s dinner. and that’s what we did. jordan and i drove with my mother and sister two hours north to my aunt’s home where we dined with all the extended family: grandmother, aunt, uncle, and all my uncle’s family. a hungry hodgepodge of people pushing each other of out the way to eat. jordan and i smoked and bitched and laughed at the peculiarity of the group that had come together.
back in birmingham, the weather had become so cold we refused to go outside so we sat on the couch by the window and smoked through the screen, which really didn’t work at all.
as my parents integrated their friends into our family, so too have i collected and contributed to my wider circle. we all do. we come together and take care of one another and share gifts and meals and champagne. we will share this holiday together. especially the champagne. i have two bottles in the fridge and i am ready for a feast.
Saturday, November 17, 2012
going caveman
to eat more like my caveman ancestors, i’ve cut grains and potatoes and legumes and beans and peanuts and dairy from my diet. i’ve quit eating the foods that were domesticated, farmed; that began appearing in the diets of humans only after the advent of farming. this leaves meats, eggs, vegetables, fruit, nuts, and seeds. the idea is to concentrate on a high protein, fatty diet and to consume carbohydrates in low levels in fruits and vegetables.
this strategy makes some sense to me for losing fat and gaining muscle. furthermore the diet prohibits the intake of foods to which large numbers of humans have historically been allergic or intolerant, specifically wheat (gluten) and dairy. i know personally i have problems drinking milk and it will interesting to see how giving up dairy (which i love) and wheat (i live on bread and cheese) will affect my body. i know those with a gluten intolerance can see significant changes to their health and body after removing gluten from their diets.
what i like and find simultaneously ridiculous about the adherents of this “paleo diet” is the fluidity of the practice. some practitioners add dairy back into their diets, or rice, or certain grain substitutes. they analyze nutrient levels to absurd degrees, research to which cavemen would not have had access. they romanticize our paleolithic ancestors as healthier, taller, more muscular - all attributed to their diets. they praise unprocessed, organic food, then expound upon the use of powdered protein shakes for exercise, for bulking up, for building muscle. i am writing they, but really i mean something of the opposite. as a group they all eat a paleo diet, but each member of this community has adapted this general diet to his or her own needs or desires. this exemplifies for me the flexibility of the human diet, the range of pleasure and satisfaction that can be derived from eating. from a basic human diet, in this case referred to as a the paleo diet, humans have and can start at a basic nutritional point which can then be added to and modified to explore and enjoy a range of tastes.
on the quotidian level i am discovering that this pared down, conscious diet may promote and sustain for me a better health.
here at almost three weeks following this diet i want to believe i already feel healthier. i understand this may be psychosomatic. i have lost some weight, though i believe the diet will help me build muscle (if i can get my workout routine together.) i cannot say that i have more energy. when i started the diet i felt constantly hungry, while my body craved bread and rice and potatoes, protesting the sudden lack of carbohydrates. these foods had been staples in my diet previously. but i have adjusted to the change. i no longer feel constantly hungry, but i think i have been eating more frequently, finding myself hungry more frequently.
i have been cheating. once a week i may take myself out to eat. mostly because at the weekend i find my house foodless meaning i need to go to the grocery store. and i’ll be honest, sometimes i get lazy. too lazy to make myself dinner. and i meant to keep myself mostly sober during november. i have been drinking a lot less than i had been this summer, but i haven’t fallen completely off the wagon. i’m still on the wagon.
and i’ll eat thanksgiving dinner. all the fixin’s. everything. it’s a holiday and this diet is not a religion. it’s more like an experiment.
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
earnest happinesses
whether he wakes up not wanting me to leave, or whether he’s wants to get me dressed and out of the house so he can go back to bed, i like waking that way. dressing and biking to work and working through the day: it’s a good day.
small beautiful moments.
a friend hosted some of my coworkers at his house to celebrate the great success my company has seen recently. we drank together, told jokes, related stories that we might not have shared in the office together, happy to share a night together away from work, away from our duties and responsibilities and professional demeanor. one woman’s young son danced around the living room, danced through our legs, grabbed our hands and led us for chases.
no scandal.
but at the end of the night, i found myself left with the host and our friend with a kid, all of us young, finishing our drinks, having a cigarette in the backyard. we stood on the porch while the boy showed us his best moves in the semi-circle of porch light, the curtain black behind him. i felt older to have friends with children, felt responsible, felt as if i had found my own time in the world. and i felt young, somehow still too young to have children, not ready for families and houses and larger responsibilities.
the moment seemed beautiful and awkward and unusual and secret, but made me happy somehow to know that we three adults shared this private performance and the child danced earnestly then laughed.
in these particular moments i think i must be living the way my father and mother must have lived when they were my age. jobs and responsibilities and waking and sleeping and children around. i know that most of the time i must lead a very different life than that of my parents. social: i go out often with friends, and generally date casually, and attend plenty of parties. not to mean my parents were not social, but they had a family at an earlier age than me. i have my friends and my cat and my job and my various interests, but not a lot to tie me down. no judgement: just different lives.
Thursday, November 1, 2012
annoyingly happy
Monday, October 22, 2012
damp days of october
i did not enjoy biking in the rain this morning. i forgot my gloves, the weather unexpectedly colder than yesterday. the back light on my bicycle has disappeared. my breaks need to be replaced. i wouldn’t describe the rain this morning as hard, but steady and persistent would be excellent adjectives. the morning dark, i had forgotten that in the winter i wake for work with night still hanging over the city.
friday, however, i revelled in the rainy pedal home from work, when i left the office: high hopes, high spirits, excited about my plans for the weekend. the rain seemed light as i began biking north from john’s landing. the weather seemed pleasant despite the chill of the showers. the frequency of the raindrops increased as i passed through the south waterfront. the wind forced the tiny splatters on the concrete into shifting patterns, lines formed by continuous drops snaked across the road. travelling up the west bank esplanade it began pouring, but enjoying the ride i decided not to stop and take the train home. the only other person out in the rain was a committed runner: shirtless, muscular, pushing a baby stroller, and though i, too, braved the rain, i did not feel half as fierce. he must be a true oregonian.
when i made it home to north portland, i found myself pretty wet despite my rain suit, but invigorated, happy. i walked down to amnesia to meet john, mikiel, and zebra.
during the commute from work, i remembered my first experience with the oregon rains four years ago. i remember october that year as painfully wet. the rain never-ending, knee high pools of water formed where leaves had piled up over sewer drains. i felt constantly damp, constantly cold, never comfortable.
i had started dating a man almost immediately upon moving to portland. he and his friends seemed indoctrinated to the wet atmosphere, accepting. this guy took me at the beginning of november as his date to his friends' wedding held at cannon beach. a large group of us carpooled from portland to the coast where we rented a house on the beach. gloomy, gray, wet, rocky, i'd never seeen the coast out here before and found myself fascinated, loved the starkness, dark but beautfiul. the wedding ceremony took place the next afternoon with a large reception afteward in a community center at the town square. late that night, with the even wrapping up, my date and four of his friends took the last few bottles of champage and walked the two miles down the beach back to the house in which we stayed. sprinkling, cold, the sand wet, the night pitch black, all i could do was take off my shoes and merrily march with the rest, singing, laughing, taking swigs of champage. at some point to live in the pacific northwest you have to learn to stoppy worrying and love the rain.
last friday night, i found myself at a party in southeast for the members of magic mouth (and boeke), the band having just returned from a month long tour across the country. the gathering spilled out of the house as friends went out to smoke. pouring we crammed in onto the porch, but as it let up, just sprinkling, we trickled out onto the sidewalk, not minding the rain too much, not minding our hair getting a little wet. my date to the party, new to the city, turned to me and said, "everyone here is wearing boots." i looked down at his own shoes and thought that soon enough he would understand his canvas shoes would not cut it in our rainy climate.
the rain here will not bother me until may. i find the cloudy skies then hardest to accept. the basil ganglia in my brain still accept the reward of spring sunlight and warmer days. but even if i can never accept the clouds that last until july, at least the clouds here both me less than they did when i first moved to portland. i no longer obsessively carry a raincoat with me everywhere.
Friday, October 12, 2012
waking over and over
Thursday, October 11, 2012
a few notes on the first presidential debate, 2012
over the past week we've heard a lot about obama's performance at the first presidential debate and mitt romney's surprising and supposed victory. tonight the nation will watch ryan paul talk against vice president biden, two men who often put their foots in their mouths. so before we watch what could be a great disaster, i thought i'd share some thoughts i had about the presidential debate we watched last week.
last week in denver, colorado president obama met republican presidential candidate mitt romney to spend an hour and a half setting up distinctions between their politics. i watched the debate from portland, oregon with john and mikiel, relaxing on john's couch. after the debate pundits, both democrat and republican, declared for romney a win after this first face-off. i had commented to mikiel that romney's dialogue seemed bullish; that it made him seem strong, confident. mikiel thought americans must see that romney is bellicose, bullying. obama's speech seemed slow, sputtering whereas romney talked away at a quick, aggressive clip. romney faced his opponent most of the time, addressed obama directly; obama looked to jim lehrer, the moderator, or to the audience watching on their televisions. obama was subquently criticized as being too professorial.
the dials showed that romeny's performance during the the debate helped dial down worries from undecided or undeclared voters that romney seemed out of touch with the concerns of average americans. however, though obama's rejoinders seemed sluggish or absent, hopefully the commonsense obama promoted made it through, seemed clear to american listeners. romney can repeat all he likes that he does not want to add to the deficit no does he want to raise taxes, but he does want to lower the tax rate on businesses and close tax loopholes and deductions manipulated by the wealthy. obama is exactly right in countering that even if the wealthy pay more taxes should the tax code be strengthened, if revenue is lost from business and defense spending remains high, how can not either the deficit or taxes on the average american household increase? intuitively, romney's vague proposals do not seem to balance, and economists (contrary to what romney insists) criticize the romney/ryan plan as idealistic, vague, and ineffectual.
if mitt romney is confused about savings from his tax and budget proposals and his healthcare plan for those with pre-existing conditions, obama seems not to have a concrete plan for promoting employment and the creation of jobs in this country. he harps on the revival of the auto industry, but those results are not seen nationwide and the tend there may still be short lived. the president talked about encouraging and strengthening education, but did not concretely explain the correlation between education and combating massive unemployment. obama, like morst democrat politicians, tends to demure from fully endorsing keynsian government expansion to encourage job creation and economic growth. the american people love to believe that the american government's budget should be treated like a household budget; it's hard to see how much more intricate a national budget and an economy are. money is not just spent by the government; the effects of any expedinture cannot be just counted against revenue. romney was right to imply that government spending can create a trickle down effect. but the difference between money flowing outward from a central government and money trickling down from big buisness is profit. the government does not have to make a profit; it feels no pressure from its shareholders. the governments objective is not to create profit for its owners but to aid the country at large. and as we know, greater profit and income does not usually trickle down; it is accumulated, kept, saved. it does not circulate. it is not spent or reinvested.
there might be more discussion on the economy tonight as paul ryan is known for being a budget wonk. though no matter where the discussion turns, no matter how substance-less you could say any of these debates will be, this vice presidential debate could at least be more entertaining than the last. john fell asleep right in the middle of the romney/obama scrap, snoring softly over their posturing.